1. Architecture Roadmaps advanced

    A CTO commits to a three-year architecture roadmap with named platforms, sequencing and a funded programme, in exchange for board approval of the budget. What has been gained, what has been given up, and when does that bill arrive?

    3 min answer roadmappingoptionalitycommitmentfunding
  2. Architecture Roadmaps advanced

    A target-state architecture was signed off 18 months ago - 9 named platform components, a 3-year sequence, £11m funded. Since then two of the nine products have been discontinued by their vendors, the team named as owner of the integration layer has been reorganised out of existence, and the event backbone has been live for a year with 2 of its 14 planned producers. The programme continues to execute against the original document. What happens over the next 12 months?

    3 min answer roadmappingtarget-statedecision-pointsdual-running
  3. Architecture Roadmaps intermediate

    An architecture roadmap covering three years is invalidated within six months by a change in product direction. How should roadmaps be built under uncertainty?

    2 min answer roadmapuncertaintyoptionssequencing
  4. Architecture Roadmaps advanced

    An organisation funds engineering through annual project business cases: each initiative is approved with a budget, a team assembled for it, and a closure date. The architecture team notices the same four problems in every review. What is the funding model buying, and what is it paying?

    3 min answer funding-modelconways-lawroadmappingownership
  5. Architecture Roadmaps advanced

    How would you sequence a two-year modernisation so that cancelling it after six months still leaves the organisation better off?

    2 min answer roadmapsequencingincremental-valuestrangler