1. Architecture Review Boards advanced

    A review board rejected a team's design in week 3 and required it to use the shared notification service instead. 14 months later that shared service's queue backed up for 4 hours during a marketing send; payment confirmations went with it, because they travelled the same path. The board's decision record names the mandate, the date and the attendees, and nothing else. What failed, and which governance decision made the outage possible?

    3 min answer architecture-review-boardshared-servicesaccountabilityblast-radius
  2. Architecture Review Boards intermediate

    An architecture review board of five people meets weekly for 90 minutes. The organisation has 120 teams shipping continuously. Leadership asks the board to review "all significant changes". Estimate what that means and what the board should actually review.

    3 min answer architecture-review-boardsgovernancecapacitythresholds
  3. Architecture Review Boards intermediate

    An architecture review board reviews everything and has a six-week queue. What should it stop reviewing, and how should the triggers be defined?

    2 min answer review-boardtriggersqueuesignificance
  4. Architecture Review Boards intermediate

    An architecture review board with a six-week queue is changed overnight: its approval becomes advisory, and teams may proceed without it. What happens over the following six months?

    2 min answer governancereview-boardssecond-order-effectsadvisory
  5. Architecture Review Boards advanced

    You inherit an architecture review board with a six-week queue and a poor reputation with engineering. What do you change first?

    2 min answer governanceinfluenceprocess