AI Executive Office — CXO Assistant Platform · View 29 of 30 · 7 · Assurance
Decisions
- Abstention is a first-class outcome with its own metric and its own review. A platform that never abstains is not more accurate, only less honest — and executives calibrate on the answers that turn out wrong
- Groundedness is checked mechanically against retrieved evidence, not asserted by the generating model. Claims that fail are removed, and the removal is recorded
- Model version and prompt version are pinned per tenant and written into the record. An answer is only reproducible if both are known
The three refusals
- Abstain entirely: no sufficient evidence, and say so in those words
- Answer partially: name which domain or which period is missing rather than quietly narrowing the question
- Escalate to a human analyst: for questions the platform can frame but not resolve
Risks
- Guardrails add latency to every turn and will be the first thing questioned when the 5-second target is missed. The groundedness check runs on the claim set rather than the full text to keep it affordable, and the budget is stated rather than discovered