Consent & Privacy Service · View 06 of 22 · People and journeys
What this view decides
- Evidence is a by-product of capture, never an assembly job. The notice version and language shown are written into the ledger entry, because they cannot be recovered later.
- Point-in-time replay — one subject, one purpose, one timestamp — is a product capability with an availability target, not a data-engineering favour.
- A finding routes to the named purpose owner. A finding with no owner recurs next quarter, which is the journey's last phase failing.
Assumptions
- Consent ledger retained 7 years after the relationship ends; administrative-action audit 7 years, write-once; decision audit sampled and retained 13 months.
- Point-in-time state reproducible for 100% of subjects inside the ledger retention window.
Tension
- The evidence proving an erasure happened must survive that erasure. It is retained under legal obligation, holds the minimum identifiers needed, and is stated plainly to the subject rather than engineered away.