1. Rebuild vs Re-architect advanced

    A 15-year-old system is unmaintainable. The team wants a full rewrite. What do you advise?

    2 min answer modernizationriskdecision
  2. Rebuild vs Re-architect advanced

    A platform's core system cannot support a capability the business needs. The team proposes a rebuild. What must be true for rebuild to beat incremental re-architecture?

    2 min answer rebuildrewriteincrementalrisk
  3. Rebuild vs Re-architect advanced

    An organisation running Kafka at trillions of messages per day concludes the coordination and rebalancing model no longer fits and builds a replacement. What evidence should exist before replacing a proven system rather than tuning it?

    3 min answer linkedinkafkanorthguardreplacement
  4. Rebuild vs Re-architect intermediate

    Review this plan. Eighteen months to rebuild the policy engine. Feature parity is required before any traffic moves. The legacy team is frozen to bug fixes only so that no effort is wasted on code that will be thrown away. What would you remove, what would you change, and what would you leave alone?

    3 min answer rewritefeature-parityarchitecture-reviewincremental-migration
  5. Rebuild vs Re-architect advanced

    YouTube's database team was running a growing fleet of MySQL instances with sharding logic spread through application code. Rather than replace MySQL or rewrite the application, they built Vitess as a routing tier between the two, open-sourcing it in 2011; it graduated in the CNCF in 2019. What did that choice buy, what did it cost, and where would copying it be a mistake?

    3 min answer youtubevitessshardingproxy layer
  6. Refactoring & Re-architecting advanced

    A high-change application is constrained by its structure. What distinguishes refactoring from re-architecting here, and how do you choose?

    2 min answer refactoringre-architectureboundariesincremental
  7. Refactoring & Re-architecting advanced

    A team proposes rewriting a critical system from scratch, arguing the existing one is unmaintainable. How do you evaluate this?

    2 min answer modernizationrewriteriskstrangler
  8. Refactoring & Re-architecting intermediate

    Figma's database stack grew roughly 100x between 2020 and 2024. Rather than shard, the team first moved groups of related tables onto their own databases, and only later sharded horizontally. What did the cheaper structural change buy, what did it leave untouched, and when does that bill arrive?

    3 min answer figmapostgresvertical-partitioningsharding
  9. Refactoring & Re-architecting advanced

    Six months into a two-year re-architecture you become convinced the target architecture is wrong. Walk me through how you raise it and what you propose.

    3 min answer decision-reversalstakeholderssunk-coststaff-level
  10. Refactoring & Re-architecting advanced

    When would you re-architect rather than replatform, and how would you sequence it?

    2 min answer rearchitectstranglerrewriteincremental
  11. Rehosting intermediate Multiple choice

    A data-centre exit must move about 600 virtual machines in nine months. The first wave moved 40 machines chosen because they were the least busy and three business applications became unusably slow overnight. What should decide which machines travel in the same wave?

    3 min answer rehostdata centre exitmove groupslatency
  12. Rehosting intermediate Multiple choice

    A data-centre lease expires in eleven months and will not be renewed. The team plans to rehost about 300 virtual machines with no application changes. Which benefit is the one rehosting reliably delivers and therefore the one the plan should be justified on?

    2 min answer rehostlift-and-shiftbusiness-casecost